We
will review the timelines that you produced last night. Our goal will
be to review not only the material from chapter 19, but to look for any
patterns in the information. Be prepared to share some of the events
that you added to your timelines.
Memo to an Emperor / Shogun:
You can choose to work with ONE partner on this if you would like. As
you know, both China and Japan chose policies of isolation for
centuries. You're going to be placed at a key point in the history of
one of these two cultures, and you will draft a memo for the ruler as to
whether or not you believe that isolation is the best policy. Here are
the two scenarios from which you may choose, and the specific
instructions are below.
China: You
are adviser to Emperor Qian-long (p. 539), who ruled from 1736 to 1795.
It is 1775, and he asks your opinion as to whether or not he should
decrease restrictions against Dutch and British traders. At that time,
they were required to pay tribute and to "kowtow" before the emperor,
and they were allowed access only to special ports. Do you recommend
making it easier to trade?
Japan: It
is 1615, and you are an advisor to Shogun Tokugawa Ieyasu. Trade has
brought cannons, goods and Christian missionaries to your shores from
Portugal and elsewhere. Some want you to drive the foreigners out, and
you actually banned Christianity three years earlier. Should Japan seal
its borders (except for the port of Nagasaki, which the shogun controls)
and become a "closed country"?
Instructions for the "memo":
Once you have chosen your scenario and decided on your position, you
need to draft your memo. First, it should have an appropriate greeting
for your emperor/ shogun. Your memo needs to consist of
1. A central argument (answer to the question/thesis)
2. Three major arguments (or "bullet points" if you like memo-speak) in support of your central position.
**Each supporting argument should be explained in a minimum of three good sentences.
These memos are due Tuesday.
Homework:
Reading Chapter 20, Section 1 for Tuesday.
Finish your memo for Tuesday.
Unit #4 Essay Exam -
Questions and Format - You'll also write one more essay as part of the
Unit #4 Exam. This essay will be turned in NO LATER than your arrival at
the final exam. Below you can find both the questions
from which you will choose and the format for the essay portion on the
Unit #4 Exam.
Format:
The actual essay will be written, by hand or word-processed. You should
prepare for a five-paragraph essay. That means that you should include
an introduction (with a clear thesis statement), three body paragraphs,
and a concluding paragraph. (Note that the questions lend themselves to
such a format. That is on purpose.)
Remember
that the questions are not designed for you to tell us everything you
have learned. Focus on what the question is requiring you to do.
1. YOU MAY CHOOSE EITHER THE RENAISSANCE OR THE REFORMATION FOR THIS QUESTION. DO NOT CHOOSE BOTH OR "MIX AND MATCH."
The
Renaissance/ Reformation was a time of profound change for the people
of Europe. Identify and explain what you believe to be the three most
significant impacts and/or legacies of the Renaissance/ Reformation.
What single historical figure do you believe best epitomized the spirit
of the Renaissance/ Reformation? Why?
2.
Identify and explain what you believe were the three most significant
motivations that led to the Age of Exploration in Europe and elsewhere.
What historical figure do you believe best symbolizes the spirit of this
period? Why?
3. The
voyages of Christopher Columbus to the Americas certainly had lasting
impacts. Identify and explain what you believe are the three most
significant consequences of the voyages of Christopher Columbus. Do you
believe he should be remembered as a hero or a villain? Why?
Identifications: For the final exam, you will write on your choice of 5 of the 8
identifications that appear on the Unit #4 exam chosen from the list
below. You may bring 10 words of "notes" for each of the 15 possible
identifications to the exam. (Printed out; not on your computer.) You
will need to turn in these notes, and I reserve the right to count
symbols, acronyms, etc. as one or more words. Each of the five
identifications is worth 5 points.
A good identification is typically in the range of 4 to 6 sentences
in length. (You do need to write in complete sentences.) You should
demonstrate both an understanding of just who / what the ID "is" and
place it in the appropriate historical context. In addition, you need
to explain the significance of the ID. In other words, answer the "So
what?" question.
Quetzalcoatl
Machu Picchu
humanism
Michelangelo
The Prince
Johann Gutenberg
John Calvin
Jesuits
Suleyman the Lawgiver
Akbar
Zheng He
Tokugawa Shogunate
Hernando Cortes
middle passage
Columbian Exchange